Settings and activity
2 results found
-
68 votes
We wanted to share an update regarding this idea. After careful consideration and further analysis of the idea, we have adjusted its status to "Not Planned."
This change allows us to further explore the feasibility and impact of this and other requested enhancements, ensuring that any updates we introduce are in the best interest of our users and align with our platform's long-term vision.
We appreciate your understanding.
Bassem Naguib supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
39 votes
Hi. We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.
Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!
Bassem Naguib supported this idea ·
Needed because:
1) Variables are not good for checkboxes
2) There is often an optional secondary signer. So the secondary signer fields may not be assigned to anybody.
3) For backward compatibility. A lot of the classic editor templates made use of unassigned fields. So allowing them on the v2 editor will make the migration much easier.