Skip to content

Settings and activity

2 results found

  1. 150 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We wanted to share an update regarding this idea. After careful consideration and further analysis of the idea, we have adjusted its status to "Not Planned."

    This change allows us to further explore the feasibility and impact of this and other requested enhancements, ensuring that any updates we introduce are in the best interest of our users and align with our platform's long-term vision.

    We appreciate your understanding.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Devin Parsons commented  · 

    Same response as everyone else. Xero integration was discussed as part of the sales process and is required by us for longer term use of PandaDoc.

    Devin Parsons supported this idea  · 
  2. 225 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Devin Parsons commented  · 

    Agree with all of the other users. Without the ability to include the attachment(s) in the final signature package and have them covered by the signature certificate there is no legal/contractural value in using attachments.

    Our use case would be to include an attachment of our Master Services Agreement with the first Service Order a new clients signs. Unless that attachment is a legally binding document when signed this is not useful. And, including 50 pages of legal text (the MSA) into a SO is not a great customer experience.

    I am not sure what use case would exist where an attachment would be part of a signature package but not be part of what was signed.

    Devin Parsons supported this idea  ·