Skip to content

Settings and activity

4 results found

  1. 238 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi. Thank you so much for reaching out about this and sharing your perspective. While we currently don’t offer this feature, we are developing something similar that addresses the most common feedback related to field colors - confusion with similar colored fields. 

    While this enhancement does not allow you to pick the colors for assignees, it will ensure that no two assignees will have similar colored fields.

    The new color palette will be available in one of our upcoming releases. We will be communicating it through our product newsletter, via alerts inside PandaDoc and here on our idea portal.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Brett Scharf commented  · 

    For those who do not know, the contact appears to be assigned color based on the email address that's entered - no matter how many times you delete the contact and recreate it with the same email address.

    However, a workaround is to add "+" before the @ symbol in an email address. For instance, if you want adam@company.com to be a signer, make the contact adam+@company.com for the color to change and for the email to still reach the recipient. You can test emailing yourself with "+" if you'd like. I can confirm that adding a "+" did change the color for a contact so my two signers now have different colors assigned so they know what they're each responsible for.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Brett Scharf commented  · 

    I repeatedly have the same color assigned to both signers of a document. Please fix this confusing setting!

    Brett Scharf supported this idea  · 
  2. 140 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi. We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.

    Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!

    Brett Scharf supported this idea  · 
  3. 223 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there! We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.

    Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!

  4. 214 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Brett Scharf commented  · 

    Please allow for the assignment of a field to be completed by more than one role. Sometimes, we have minors and guardians that need to complete a document - and sometimes one has more information than the other.

    Brett Scharf supported this idea  ·