Skip to content

Settings and activity

6 results found

  1. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Allen Vance supported this idea  · 
  2. 19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Allen Vance commented  · 

    We need multiple levels of conditional fields, but currently there is only one. Meaning if a set of radio buttons is required based on a selection of radio buttons, those secondary radio buttons cannot themselves require additional fields. There are many documents with this kind of layering so it's important. For example, many financial institutions have complicated forms where we have to select one option and then within that option we have to select one option and within that option we have to enter information into fields.

    Allen Vance supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Allen Vance commented  · 

    We need multiple levels of conditional fields, but currently there is only one. Meaning if a set of radio buttons is required based on a selection of radio buttons, those secondary radio buttons cannot themselves require additional fields. There are many documents with this kind of layering so it's important. If I'm incorrect, can someone explain to me how to do it?

  3. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Allen Vance supported this idea  · 
  4. 39 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Allen Vance commented  · 

    For anyone struggling with lack of documentation and PandaDoc lack of awareness, I was able to accomplish this with the Hubspot integration at least, so I expect it may be the same with SFDC. You create and assign the field and then click on settings, then in the merge filed box at the lower right I entered the HubSpot variable WITHOUT brackets (entering with brackets creates a non-user field). I then created a new doc inside HubSpot (through the Panda Integration in the left sidebar), which then pulled in the variables which were then editable by the recipient. YAY!!

    Allen Vance supported this idea  · 
  5. 242 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Allen Vance commented  · 

    First day..initial setup...womp womp

  6. 167 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. However, we now support a specific use case: calculating a date field based on the signature date (e.g. signing date + X days). To learn more about Autofill with Custom Date based on Signing Date, click here.

    Allen Vance supported this idea  ·