Skip to content

Settings and activity

14 results found

  1. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Zach Snyder shared this idea  · 
  2. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Zach Snyder commented  · 

    I really like this idea! We have many optional add-on services, and clients don't always remember what they are. I don't want to put hyperlinks out of the document for each add-on, so I have a feature sheet attached to the document, but it makes the document way too long, and the file size too large for email sometimes.

    Having an "i" button or similar to click or hover on to get more info on that product would be the best solution, so clients can see exactly what that product/add-on is, make a choice, and not have to leave the doc.

    Zach Snyder supported this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Zach Snyder supported this idea  · 
  4. 39 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Zach Snyder supported this idea  · 
  5. 168 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. However, we now support a specific use case: calculating a date field based on the signature date (e.g. signing date + X days). To learn more about Autofill with Custom Date based on Signing Date, click here.

    Zach Snyder supported this idea  · 
  6. 84 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi. We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.

    Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Zach Snyder commented  · 

    I have set up fields in my CRM to auto-calculate pricing for each line item, and it would be great if those variables could transfer automatically in the corresponding pricing table price column!

    Zach Snyder supported this idea  · 
  7. 124 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi. We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.

    Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!

    Zach Snyder supported this idea  · 
  8. 223 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Zach Snyder supported this idea  · 
  9. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Zach Snyder supported this idea  · 
  10. 233 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Zach Snyder supported this idea  · 
  11. 24 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. 28 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Zach Snyder commented  · 

    please add this! Seems silly to have to have an extra click when there could just be a search box on the dash. thanks!

    Zach Snyder supported this idea  · 
  13. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Zach Snyder supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Zach Snyder commented  · 

    You should make it so that as a user, I can change a contact's information while managing the recipients in a document. For example, I have a contact that is now employed at a different school, and I know she is in PandaDoc, because I've sent her documents before. What I wanted to do was add her as a recipient, and then change her email address, but I could not do that. I had to get out of the document I was on, go to contacts, find her, edit her, and go back to the doc and add her now that the info was updated. Would have been easier and faster to be able to edit her info while I was in the doc itself, so I didn't have to change "modules" or whatever you call documents, templates, contacts, etc.

  14. 56 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi. We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.

    Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Zach Snyder commented  · 

    You should be able to create custom variables that are based on other variables. For example, you should be able to make Variable C [[Variable A]+[Variable B]], or have the ability to add formulas to the table cells, similarly to Excel. It seems like there is some sort of this functionality with the system variable [Document.Value], but you cannot create your own variable that adds multiple pricing table totals together in one variable.

    Zach Snyder supported this idea  ·