Skip to content

Ideas to Improve PandaDoc

💡 To help us understand (and hopefully implement!) your suggestion, please answer these few questions as you propose your idea:
  • What specific actions or behaviors do you expect from this feature?
  • What is the issue that this functionality would address for you? Why would you require it?

Ideas to Improve PandaDoc

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

770 results found

  1. Option to customize follow-up (manual) reminder text

    62 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  2. he new PandaDoc editor no longer supports negative padding on content blocks such as images and text boxes. This was a key design capability they relied on and was one of their primary reasons for choosing PandaDoc.
    Specific request: restore negative padding support in the new editor experience before the Q3 full rollout.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  3. In the classic editor, we could add or remove payment on a per-document basis directly from the right-hand panel. This gave us the flexibility to decide at the time of creating a document whether payment collection was needed — without having to go back and modify the template every time.

    Since the new editor rollout, payment is now controlled exclusively at the template workflow level. If a template has a "Collect Payment" step, every document created from it is forced through that step with no way to skip or remove it on the fly.

    This is a significant workflow regression…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Workflows  ·  Admin →
  4. Currently, when a document is sent to a recipient via PandaDoc, anyone who opens the public recipient link - including internal team members - is recorded as a view in document analytics. There is no way to distinguish between an external recipient viewing the document and an internal employee accidentally clicking the same link.
    The requested feature: when a user clicks a document's public link, PandaDoc should prompt them to enter their email address before granting access. This would allow PandaDoc to:

    Accurately identify who viewed the document
    Distinguish internal (team member) views from external (recipient) views
    Optionally exclude known…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
  5. Allow approval workflows to conditionally route documents based on specific line items (SKUs, product names, etc.) included in a Pricing Table or Quote Builder.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Workflows  ·  Admin →

    Hi,

    Thank you for taking the time to leave your request. We have great news – the feature you requested is already available. For more information, please click the link below!

    https://support.pandadoc.com/en/articles/16442466-conditional-approvals-with-quotes-new-experience

  6. In the classic editor, recently used hex color codes were saved as persistent swatches within a document, allowing users to quickly reuse custom colors when editing individual table cells without having to retype the hex code each time. Since the rollout of the new editor experience, this behavior no longer persists. Users who apply custom hex colors to individual cells are required to manually retype the hex code every time, significantly disrupting their editing workflow. Please consider restoring this color swatch persistence in the new editor.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  7. On the new editor, you are only able to remove payments on a template level. Please add back the functionality to remove it on an individual basis on a document level.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  8. Give us back the ability to edit expiration dates without editing and resending a document. This has always been a feature and now it was removed with the latest update with no warning. Your help bot and articles give bad/outdated info and the latest update article says nothing change besides the look but thats not true.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Workflows  ·  Admin →
  9. Inline fields to be utilized inside a table block

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  10. Improve the document conversion processes to ensure that when documents are downloaded from or uploaded to PandaDoc, they reflect the original format seen in the editor with high fidelity.

    Improving the import, editing, and handling processes for complex and legal documents within PandaDoc, ensuring that specialized formatting like legal numbering and structured indentations are preserved accurately.

    "Adding in a legal document with the below format does not work. We're having to manually type each number out for a 20 page document which is a massive headache when changing/updating."
    "Please can panda docs improve 'the Only simple number lists (with numbers,…

    192 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  11. Enable signing with MitID, Bank ID, or Swiss ID. These are all examples of national eID or digital identity solutions widely used in Nordic countries.

    25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  12. Client/prospect needs to set radio buttons as optional when creating documents from file upload using field tags
    Currently, the * optional modifier works for textfield, checkbox, dropdown, signature, date, and initials field tags (e.g., {textfield*____}), but not for radio buttons

    Radio buttons use a different syntax ({{radio:role:optId}}) and don't support the optional modifier

    This forces manual configuration after document creation, which doesn't work for automated workflows

    Request to add optional modifier support to radio button field tags for consistency with other field types

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
  13. The ability to change the time zone of the timestamp for the certificate of signature. The time zone can be changed but it may confuse users and signers since time is different as it shows as UTC

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  14. 26 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Hi,

    Thank you for taking the time to leave your request. We have great news – the feature you requested is already available. Quote, localized based on your profile language, will be inherited in exported pdfs.

    It will be applied to newly added quote blocks only.

  15. Edit content directly within the columns without having to open the Edit Quote page.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  16. Please go back to the old interface and layout. The new interface and layout make's no sense. Trying to make it sleek and modern when there was nothing wrong with the old interface. Please go back and get rid of this new one. You also have to open the Template to create a document now, instead of being able to hover over the template and create a document.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
  17. Passing HTML or Markdown through API variables

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
  18. Adding an extra click to be able to start a new document is ridiculous. Tell your design people to learn something about UX. So annoying.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  19. The client needs to make sure the design of their quotes is EXACTLY as it used to be - they were using pricing tables before. Now that they moved to CPQ, there are some quote design limitations that are critical for them:
    Bold column headers
    Alternate row colours
    Italic description

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Hi,

    Thank you for taking the time to leave your request. We have great news – the feature you requested is already available. For more information, please click the link below!

    https://support.pandadoc.com/en/articles/14019817-pricing-tables-are-being-upgraded-to-quote-builder

  20. Option to arrange folders in Rooms

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Rooms  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1 3 4 5 38 39
  • Don't see your idea?