Settings and activity
25 results found
-
5 votes
Steve Hodson
supported this idea
·
-
25 votes
Hi,
Thank you for taking the time to leave your request. We have great news – the feature you requested is already available. For more information, please click the link below!
An error occurred while saving the comment Steve Hodson
supported this idea
·
-
29 votes
Hi there! Thank you for your feature request submitted to PandaDoc! We do appreciate it!
We’re glad to let you know that the feature “Recipient Verification via SMS” has been released. Please see this link for more information: Recipient SMS verification.
Have a wonderful day!
Steve Hodson
supported this idea
·
-
265 votes
Hi there,
Thank you for taking the time to submit your feature request to PandaDoc’s UserVoice. We have great news!
2-Factor Authentication (2FA) has been released and can be configured via Settings > Security. For more information on 2-Factor Authentication, check out this article.
We appreciate your help in making PandaDoc the best product for our customers. If you have any ideas on how we can continue to improve, please continue to submit them here.
Steve Hodson
supported this idea
·
-
243 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
-
195 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
-
192 votes
Hi,
Thank you for taking the time to leave your request. We have great news – the feature you requested is already available. For more information, please click the link below!
Working with numbered lists -
197 votes
Hi. We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.
Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote! -
197 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
-
198 votes
Hi. We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.
Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote! -
86 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.
Steve Hodson
supported this idea
·
-
273 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
Steve Hodson
supported this idea
·
-
144 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.
Steve Hodson
supported this idea
·
-
80 votes
Hi. We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.
Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!
Steve Hodson
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Steve Hodson
commented
+1 for quickbooks online
-
357 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.
Steve Hodson
supported this idea
·
-
231 votes
We wanted to share an update regarding the idea. After careful consideration and further analysis of the idea, we have adjusted its status to "Not Planned."
This change allows us to further explore the feasibility and impact of this and other requested enhancements, ensuring that any updates we introduce are in the best interest of our users and align with our platform's long-term vision.
We appreciate your understanding.
An error occurred while saving the comment Steve Hodson
commented
by tokens i assume this means variables
Steve Hodson
supported this idea
·
-
228 votes
Hi. Thank you so much for reaching out and sharing your perspective. While we currently don’t offer this feature, we made some improvements to our product that may help you cover those scenarios namely:
We hope these releases can help you. If not, please keep upvoting this idea, so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.
An error occurred while saving the comment Steve Hodson
commented
Plus if customer changes the quantity of product A then product B quantity changes to match it
Steve Hodson
supported this idea
·
-
92 votes
The feature allowing to Copy Office Suite / Google Workspace / HTML tables into PandaDoc
document is available within the system. Please see the link for more information: https://support.pandadoc.com/hc/en-us/articles/5303817783575-Copy-Office-Suite-Google-Workspace-HTML-tables-into-PandaDoc
Have a wonderful day!
Steve Hodson
supported this idea
·
-
311 votes
Released to general availability
Steve Hodson
supported this idea
·
-
111 votes
Hi there! Thank you for your feature request submitted to PandaDoc! We do appreciate it!
We’re glad to let you know that the feature “Volume based pricing” has been released. Please see this link for more information: Volume based pricing.
Have a wonderful day!
Steve Hodson
supported this idea
·
Reasons this is needed:
1. It is quite easy to send the wrong link to the wrong person - that way a customer could sign off the sender's fields like pricing. When a recipient's email is already a pandadoc licensed user it would be very easy for Pandadoc to work out that they already have a login and make that link only accessible to that logged in user.
2. It is also easy for people to forward their links not using the forwarding feature - e.g. the customer forwards the link to their manager to sign. This results in contracts getting esigned by a person who isn't the person in the electronic signature verification. This would make it very hard to prove who signed the document in court and makes the whole electronic signature element rather pointless.
You would still want to make it easy for anyone to fill in and sign documents, but the additional security or checks would be good to make sure the person signing is the intended recipient.
3.