Settings and activity
27 results found
-
135 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.
An error occurred while saving the comment Mickel supported this idea ·
-
206 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.
An error occurred while saving the comment The absence of the feature to move documents between workspaces is not just a minor inconvenience; it should have been included as a default option for the Enterprise plan, especially considering the substantial monthly fee of $89 that is already being paid. It is inevitable for organizations with multiple Enterprise users to experience growth and undergo changes. Hence, the ability to seamlessly transfer documents between workspaces is fundamental and should be readily available.
-
145 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
-
95 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
-
180 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.
-
321 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.
-
3 votes
-
74 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
-
8 votes
-
21 votes
-
70 votes
Hi there! Thank you for submitting your idea. Unfortunately, we aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap. Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!
-
143 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.
-
233 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.
-
3 votes
-
6 votes
-
6 votes
-
108 votes
Hi there. Thank you for submitting this idea! We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap. Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!
-
129 votes
Hi! Thank you so much for sharing your perspective. While we currently don’t offer this feature, we put forward the following solution, that may help you cover this scenario, namely:
Please contact our Support team if you need to delete tags. If you have a Member role we might request approval from an admin user on your account.
We hope this suggestion can help you. If not, please keep upvoting this idea, so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Possibility to hide the (section) header similar to the option 'normal' Tables already have in their Settings.
With both Header and Section header as a required row we are forced to have two headers before products can be added. I only need one header to make clear what the products are about.
-
3 votes
This should have been possible by default. The inability to add custom fields to Contacts is a significant limitation in a solution that aims to improve efficiency and automation. Custom fields are essential for achieving an optimal workflow, and the restriction to a very limited set of default fields doesn't align with the purpose of this type of software.