Settings and activity
5 results found
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment 
jules
commented
It seems that PandaDoc is lacking a variable "insert image here", which is a crucial matter in regard to legal issues (for e.g. insurance companies, lawyers etc) as missing photos inside that document: Missing visible evidence.
Example (logistics):
During an inspection of loading of sea containers, a lot of issues need to be checked. We have an inspection form.For some checks, photos (evidence) are required.
Not as attachments, but inside the form!
Photos of the condition of outside walls, for example (front, left side, back, right side; no dents, no damage).
That need to be declared, and photos should be inserted IN the form as evidence for insurance companies, carriers, lawyers). Can be a crucial matter in case of legal battles.That option is lacking.
This is in my opinion a huge lack and I hope this feature can be implemented ASAP.
I don’t think it’s a difficult matter. It’s just a feature no one ever thought about.
Almost as important as a signature.Suggestion:
Variable “Place image”:1) Click on a “place image” variable and select from photos on an iPad or so
And/or
2) Click on a “place image” variable, get a selection screen
a) “From your photos library"
b) "choose file (jpg, png) from your device” (this option is different from photo library, since jpg files could be saved somewhere outside the photo library)
c) “Open camera” (and user makes a photo and photo will be inserted)Number 1 would be great. Number 2 (a, b and c) would be absolutely fantastic.
jules
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesjules
supported this idea
·
-
188 votes
Hi. We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.
Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!jules
supported this idea
·
-
663 votes
Hi. Thank you so much for reaching out and sharing your perspective. We offer this feature in scope of a broader solution, namely:
We hope these releases can help you. If not, please keep upvoting this idea, so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.
jules
supported this idea
·
-
63 votes
Hi. Thank you so much for reaching out and sharing your perspective. While we currently don’t offer this feature, we made some improvements to our product that may help you cover those scenarios namely:
- You can use Conditional Content to pass images as variables. Please see more here.
- Passing images is also available via Pricing table or Quote Builder. Check this link for more info.
If you need help with the set up, please feel free to reach out to our Support team for assistance!
We hope these releases can help you. If not, please keep upvoting this idea, so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.
An error occurred while saving the comment jules
commented
WOW. This request is already from 2020!!
I just requested the same (26 jan 2023...).
Have this implemented, guys.
Having these photos included is very important evidence in case of liabilities and legal cases.
Not as attachments, but visible at the location in the form where I want them to have.I can’t imagine I am the only one who would like to see that variable and I think it isn’t difficult for PandaDoc’s development team to have that implemented. Pretty straightforward stuff, I think.
Like a variable “Place image”:
1) Click on a “place image” variable and select from photos on an iPad or so
And/or
2) Click on a “place image” variable, get a selection screen
a) “From your photos library"
b) "choose file (jpg, png) from your device” (this option is different from photo library, since jpg files could be saved somewhere outside the photo library)
c) “Open camera” (and user makes a photo and photo will be inserted)Number 1 would be great. Number 2 (a, b and c) would be absolutely fantastic.
jules
supported this idea
·
I'm quite shocked that such an important issue was addressed already in 2020 and no response was given.