Skip to content

Ideas to Improve PandaDoc

đź’ˇ Your PandaDoc ideas are getting a better home!

We appreciate all the feedback and ideas you’ve shared with our Product Team. Starting October 15th, UserVoice goes read-only as we migrate feedback to the new PandaDoc Community. Don't worry—your existing ideas and votes will come with us!

Questions? Reach out to the PandaDoc Support Team.

Ideas to Improve PandaDoc

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

136 results found

  1. I want to add the products in a table that can then be selected or deselected but I want the catalogue images to be populated in there

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Add an option to transfer document ownership via API without sending an email notification to the new owner.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. extend recipient view audit log to include all views, not just the first

    this would be required for a security access audit on the document, controls need to exist to show details about every view

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. add audit trail entries for internal users that access/open a document

    even after a document is signed, for security access control audits

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. in the document details endpoint, for each recipient, add the number of views that recipient has had on the underlying document

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. When a DOCX file is uploaded via the PandaDoc API, it remains static and read-only by default, and the "Make editable" conversion currently requires a user to manually open the document in the editor UI.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. When a bundle document is signed, the recipientcompleted webhook returns pricing.tables[] with no reference to which section each table belongs to. The same gap exists in GET /documents/{id}/details. There's currently no way to cross-reference pricing tables back to their originating bundle section via the API.
    Request: Add a section
    uuid field to each pricing table object in:

    recipientcompleted webhook — pricing.tables[].sectionuuid
    GET /public/v1/documents/{id}/details — pricing.tables[].section_uuid

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. The ability to use a phone number (E.164 format) in place of an email address in the recipient field of the POST /documents/{id}/session endpoint.

    Currently, the endpoint only accepts an email address.

    For cases where recipients have no email address on file and the app handles the signing experience directly.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Request to have a public API endpoint to enable Stripe payments without manually doing it in the UI.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. At the moment, the "Template updated" webhook trigger includes the following events:

    Changes to template name
    Changes to template roles
    Addition of a section

    The feature request is to extend the “Template Updated” webhook trigger scope to cover updates to templates fields (or possibly introduce a separate trigger "Template updates (fields)".

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. If the email specified in the sender parameter does not match an existing workspace user, PandaDoc may automatically assign the document to the default workspace sender. In PandaDoc, the document owner always takes precedence over the sender parameter if the sender does not match the document owner or meet workspace requirements. Even if your API call sets a different sender, the document will still be sent from the document owner.

    Would like this to not occur, and allow for the sender perimeter to set the sender email

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Request for a new API endpoint that returns all workspaces associated with a specific user within an organization.

    Example desired functionality:

    GET /users/{user_id}/workspaces

    or

    GET /user-workspaces?user_id={id}

    This would allow integrators to dynamically determine which workspaces a user belongs to without retrieving the full user list across the organization.

    Customer Context

    Customer operates a franchise model with:

    40+ workspaces

    500+ users

    Shared identity across the organization

    Heavy API-based embedded document workflows

    Users may belong to multiple workspaces simultaneously.

    The customer initiates document creation from their CRM and needs to determine which workspace the user should interact with before creating the document.

    …

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Currently, users are using the existing “List Catalog Items Search” endpoint to retrieve and export all catalog items via the API. However, this endpoint was originally designed as a search endpoint, intended to filter a relatively small subset of items based on a specific query. It was not built to reliably return the entire catalog, which can lead to limitations and unintended errors when used as a full listing mechanism.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. It's currently not possible to make uploaded .docx file editable using the PandaDoc Editor NPM Library: https://www.npmjs.com/package/pandadoc-editor
    We would like it to work the same way as within the native PandaDoc application.
    we should be able to make .docx files editable using this NPM Library

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. For the 'Catalog item details' API request to return product's subcategory.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. The ability to "escape" the interpretation of square brackets ([]) as Variables via the API.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Ability to configure whether fields added in the embedded editor are required by default (or have an option to toggle this behavior).

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. You cannot currently create a document via the API and leave the smart content block in a “pending selection” mode (i.e., so the user can later choose from the pre-selected content in the UI) in the exact same way as you can in the Editor. When using the API, you must specify which content library item(s) to insert into each smart content block at the time of document creation, or make the block optional (which means it can be empty in the generated document). The API does not support leaving the smart content block in the same “interactive, user-selectable” state…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?