Skip to content

Settings and activity

19 results found

  1. 25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi. We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.
    Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!

    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Colleen - PPS commented  · 

    This is critical to comply with Cyber Security risk mitigation requirements. Because PandaDoc does not currently provide a setting that it is mandatory, we cannot "tick the box" that all of our systems have mandatory 2FA/MFA for both logins and sharing documents.
    The SMS verification functionality is also inconsistent for creating documents. Creating a new document includes a 'key' (with a handy red dot if phone number does not exist) for each selected recipient that automates the process. Creating a document from a template, does not include this same "key" for each selected recipient.
    If the "Add Document Recipients" pop-up works the same for ALL methods of creating documents, this would be acceptable.

  3. 51 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi. We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.

    Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!

    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Colleen - PPS commented  · 

    Time zone of every date related to any document/verification should be according to the time zone in our settings.

  4. 27 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
  5. 106 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi. We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.

    Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!

    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
  6. 69 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
  7. 91 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi. Thank you so much for reaching out and sharing your perspective. While we currently don’t offer this feature, we made some improvements to our product that may help you cover those scenarios namely:

    - CPQ: Quote Rules

    If you'd like to learn more about the feature availability, please reach out to your associated CSM or AM or leave a request to our Support team.

    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
  8. 132 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Great news! We're updating our platform to let you easily format data passed from your CRM right in PandaDoc. We're now working on a UX that will allow data formatting and normalization right on the UI (in addition to standard hardcoded rules on the backend). Stay tuned for a smoother, more intuitive experience!

    Thanks for your suggestions – they're helping us make our platform better for everyone.

    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
  9. 151 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi. We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.

    Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!

    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
  10. 188 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. However, we now support a specific use case: calculating a date field based on the signature date (e.g. signing date + X days). To learn more about Autofill with Custom Date based on Signing Date, click here.

    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
  11. 96 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
  12. 25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Colleen - PPS commented  · 

    The ability to export content from fillable fields and upload or transfer to another document - and/or to CRM - is a critical for productivity as well as accuracy (reduced errors). I would think it should be possible - and the proviso should be that the fillable field has the same name as a variable used in other document/s and CRM.

    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
  13. 41 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
  14. 59 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We wanted to share an update regarding this idea. After careful consideration and further analysis of the idea, we have adjusted its status to "Not Planned."

    This change allows us to further explore the feasibility and impact of this and other requested enhancements, ensuring that any updates we introduce are in the best interest of our users and align with our platform's long-term vision.

    We appreciate your understanding.

    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
  15. 45 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Colleen - PPS commented  · 

    This feature would be awesome - for variables that are empty (as we don't yet have the information in the CRM to merge into the variable) and for variables than need updating with new/current information.

  16. 55 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Solution Exists  ·  Katie Hudson responded

    Hi there! Thank you for taking the time to leave your request. Unfortunately this feature does not exist natively, however there is a workaround to obtain the necessary download. Please submit a ticket to the Support Team to export all documents (or completed+paid) with the files uploaded into collect files field.

    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
  17. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
  18. 15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Colleen - PPS commented  · 

    This is critical for us. We bulk send ongoing fee consent agreements and the information from merged data includes private details that should be protected by recipient verification before opening the document.

    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  · 
  19. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Colleen - PPS commented  · 

    This is critical for us. As Financial Advisers, we are expected to have high levels of cyber security and to educate our clients on risks of responding to unknown emails, SMS and social media requests (or requests that are potentially impersonating our business and are actually cyber criminals). The verification text does not mention our company at all - only PandaDoc - and comes from TWVerify. This is too much to ask of clients to feel secure about two names that that they are not familiar with ... and we are experiencing many of them not trusting the verification SMS (or ignoring/deleting it before realising it is connected with our business/document).

    Colleen - PPS supported this idea  ·