Settings and activity
13 results found
-
26 votes
Quincy Berg
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesQuincy Berg
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesQuincy Berg
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesQuincy Berg
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesQuincy Berg
supported this idea
·
-
129 votes
We wanted to share an update regarding this idea. After careful consideration and further analysis of the idea, we have adjusted its status to "Not Planned."
This change allows us to further explore the feasibility and impact of this and other requested enhancements, ensuring that any updates we introduce are in the best interest of our users and align with our platform's long-term vision.
We appreciate your understanding.
Quincy Berg
supported this idea
·
-
59 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
Quincy Berg
supported this idea
·
-
176 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. However, we now support a specific use case: calculating a date field based on the signature date (e.g. signing date + X days). To learn more about Autofill with Custom Date based on Signing Date, click here.
Quincy Berg
supported this idea
·
-
130 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
An error occurred while saving the comment -
12 votesQuincy Berg
supported this idea
·
-
22 votesQuincy Berg
shared this idea
·
-
62 votes
Hi,
Thank you for taking the time to leave your request. We have great news – the option you are looking for already exists. For more information, please check the video below:
Quincy Berg
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Quincy Berg
commented
One person can sign in multiple places in the signing order. Right now PandaDoc doesn't allow you to place one email in multiple signing order positions, the signing order breaks
An error occurred while saving the comment Quincy Berg
commented
if you use the gmail trick where you add +1 to the end of someones email that is an ok workaround but the signature certificate doesn't hold a proper audit trail
-
35 votes
Hi. We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.
Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!
An error occurred while saving the comment Quincy Berg
commented
helpful for searching for specific phrases in documents as opposed to just one word at a time
This is crucial for CLM workflows