Skip to content

Ideas to Improve PandaDoc

💡 To help us understand (and hopefully implement!) your suggestion, please answer these few questions as you propose your idea:
  • What specific actions or behaviors do you expect from this feature?
  • What is the issue that this functionality would address for you? Why would you require it?

Ideas to Improve PandaDoc

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

5657 results found

  1. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Customer doesn't want to generate a NEW document if he made changes to details in his Cooper account. Wants the existing document to adapt to the new changes

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Ability to adjust were the optional checkbox falls in a pricing table

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Make the check boxes options that are not "checked" from the sender's side disappear once the document is sent to the client.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Button accept before signing the document from the clients' side.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. api revision number token for document changes

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Ability to remove all custom fields at once on multiple catalog items

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. When Signer 1 is signing a document with defined signing order, hover text showing Signer 2's info appears on disabled fields; customer requests a way to hide this hover text for privacy.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Workflows  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Enterprise customers need a reusable rule/content architecture for Smart Content and conditional template logic.

    Today:

    • Conditional content rules live only inside individual templates
    • Rules cannot be centrally managed or reused globally
    • Updating business logic requires manually editing many templates
    • Content blocks can be reused, but the governance of the logic itself cannot

    This creates major operational pain around:

    • template maintenance
    • rule duplication
    • template drift
    • scaling RevOps operations
    • governance consistency across teams

    Desired functionality:

    • reusable conditional content sections/pages
    • shared rule libraries
    • “define once, reuse everywhere” architecture
    • centralized rule management
    • global updates across templates
    • reusable smart content modules with embedded logic
    • template…
    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Currently, bundling documents can only be done for documents in Templates. However, the individual documents found in Templates can't be updated easily with "Replace Source File." This feature is only available in Content Library.

    Updating various documents to be bundled together in Templates requires that I have the documents as Content Library items to perform any updates. Using "Replace Source File" allows me to keep any fields that were created rather than having to create them all over again or copying and pasting. Once it's updated as a Content Library item, I have to create a new Template with the…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Customer is requesting improvements to multi-workspace API architecture for Enterprise franchise use cases.

    Current customer environment:

    40+ franchise offices
    Each franchise requires its own PandaDoc workspace
    Users may belong to multiple workspaces
    CRM + embedded signing workflow is the primary use case
    PandaDoc is being used primarily as an API-driven signing/orchestration layer

    Current pain points:

    Workspace API keys are isolated per workspace
    Customer must maintain:
    workspace API keys
    workspace/user mappings
    webhook management per workspace
    synchronization logic internally
    No efficient org-level way to dynamically determine which workspaces a specific user belongs to

    Main customer request:

    Org-level API endpoint to retrieve workspace…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. I have seen that it is possible to update fields in Pipedrive through variables present in a document. Although there is no way at the moment, to decide WHICH varibles (and so CRM fields) to update, leaving the others unchanged.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Automations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. It would be great if the final, completed document signed by customers could be saved as a different file name than the template name.

    For example, the Template Name is Pacific Solar Contract - [Deal.DealName] because it is customer facing, but when the final, signed PDF is downladed to our server, we would like to name the file yyyy-mm-dd - [Deal.DealName], Signed Contract (with the date being the completed date).

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Is there a way to pass through payment processing fees to the customer based on their selected payment method?

    Currently, I apply a flat 3% “Credit Card Fee” to invoices, but bank transfer/ACH processing fees are actually lower. I’d like to offer customers multiple payment options while only charging the applicable processing fee for the method they choose, rather than charging ACH/bank transfer customers the higher credit card rate.

    Ideally, this would:

    Automatically adjust the fee based on payment method

    Clearly display the fee breakdown to the customer

    Allow lower-cost payment methods like ACH/bank transfer to have reduced fees

    Still…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?