Skip to content

Ideas to Improve PandaDoc

💡 To help us understand (and hopefully implement!) your suggestion, please answer these few questions as you propose your idea:
  • What specific actions or behaviors do you expect from this feature?
  • What is the issue that this functionality would address for you? Why would you require it?

Ideas to Improve PandaDoc

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

2977 results found

  1. It would be extremely valuable if the audit log retained historical data for longer than the current retention period.

    Currently, if a document was deleted or archived more than six months ago, there is no way to identify who performed the action or when it occurred. This makes investigating historical issues or responding to customer queries difficult.

    An extended or searchable audit history would improve traceability, accountability, compliance, and troubleshooting by allowing administrators to review document activity beyond the current retention window. Ideally, organisations could configure the retention period based on their business or compliance requirements.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Please add an option to attach a PDF copy of the quote to the email PandaDoc sends recipients. Currently the email only links to the dynamic quote. Many customers prefer a PDF they can save, forward. Ideally a toggle at the template/workspace level.

    Not just attachment on completion.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Automations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. The customer would like to see Document.Value as a field on pandadocPandaDocDocumentc object in Salesforce.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Populate the product description from Pipedrive from Products -> Variation -> Comment, currently it is passed from Deal -> Products -> Show details -> Comment.

    12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. You should be able to select options:
    Remove the auto-delete function in the Archive
    Or set a timeline of your choosing
    Or manually delete from the archive

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. As AI-generated content becomes increasingly common in sales proposals, organisations need governance to ensure customer-facing documents are accurate, compliant and on-brand before they are sent.

    We would like PandaDoc to automatically detect AI-generated text and images within a proposal and trigger a configurable approval workflow.

    Business case
    Many organisations encourage the use of AI to improve productivity, but AI-generated content can introduce risks including:

    Incorrect branding and logos
    Inaccurate product or technical claims
    Misleading AI-generated images or diagrams
    Over-promising functionality
    Legal, compliance and reputational risk

    Rather than preventing AI use, PandaDoc should help organisations govern it.

    Expected behaviour
    When AI-generated…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Approvals  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Enable SCIM group object provisioning and support dynamic workspace, role, and license assignment in PandaDoc based on IdP group membership (Okta, Entra, or other SAML/SCIM providers).

    10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. he new PandaDoc editor no longer supports negative padding on content blocks such as images and text boxes. This was a key design capability they relied on and was one of their primary reasons for choosing PandaDoc.
    Specific request: restore negative padding support in the new editor experience before the Q3 full rollout.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. In workspaces with 21 CFR Part 11 compliance, SMS verification is required. The phone number should auto-populate from the workspace user profile to reduce manual entry and support compliance workflows at scale

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Ability to schedule a notary session on behalf of someone else, similar to how you can send a document on behalf of someone else.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. I need to connect Pandadoc room events to HubSpot to measure how many HubSpot deals we have sent to a room

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Rooms  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. the ability to pull data fields from contracts via API or Webhooks

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Have the Company Name of the contact show in the contact list just like the name and email address.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Description:
    When a document is completed (signed by all parties), there is currently no visual indicator in the Documents list showing whether the sender has personally reviewed that document after completion. In teams managing high volumes of signed contracts, completed documents can accumulate without any way to tell at a glance which ones have been reviewed and which haven't.

    Feature request:
    Add a Read/Unread visual indicator to the Documents list — similar to how email inboxes distinguish read from unread messages — showing whether the document owner has opened a completed document since its completion date.

    Expected behavior:

    Documents the…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Add an option to transfer document ownership via API without sending an email notification to the new owner.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. extend recipient view audit log to include all views, not just the first

    this would be required for a security access audit on the document, controls need to exist to show details about every view

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. add audit trail entries for internal users that access/open a document

    even after a document is signed, for security access control audits

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. in the document details endpoint, for each recipient, add the number of views that recipient has had on the underlying document

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. When a document is rejected in an approval workflow, PandaDoc currently only allows a free-text comment as feedback. While helpful, this makes it very difficult to track, categorize, and report on rejection trends at scale.

    What we're requesting:
    A mandatory or optional dropdown field that appears when an approver rejects a document, allowing them to select a predefined rejection reason category (e.g., "Rep Error," "Missing Information," "System Issue," "Pricing Error," etc.) before the rejection is submitted. Ideally this would be configurable per workspace or template so teams can define their own categories.

    The ideal outcome:

    Approvers select a rejection reason…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Ability to send reminders to recipients for on demand notary sessions.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3 4 5 148 149
  • Don't see your idea?