Settings and activity
11 results found
-
180 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.
An error occurred while saving the comment Lorraine Ashover
commented
This would be really useful - we want to ensure that all info is captured correctly in our documents, which involves making our fields compulsory in as many places as possible. Allowing conditional fields in the content library means that we can do this throughout the docuemtn, ensuring that signers complete all the required information, but arent forced to enter information in places that isnt relevant.
Its great to have this feature in the core template, but not being able to include it in the content drawn from the library makes it rather redundant!Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
69 votes
We wanted to share an update regarding zooming in or out of the document. After careful consideration and further analysis of the idea, we have adjusted its status to "Not Planned."
This change allows us to further explore the feasibility and impact of this and other requested enhancements, ensuring that any updates we introduce are in the best interest of our users and align with our platform's long-term vision.
We appreciate your understanding.Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
97 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
154 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
143 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
292 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
663 votes
Hi. Thank you so much for reaching out and sharing your perspective. We offer this feature in scope of a broader solution, namely:
We hope these releases can help you. If not, please keep upvoting this idea, so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
58 votes
Hi. We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.
Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!
An error occurred while saving the comment Lorraine Ashover
commented
This is really important to us - a lot of our existing pricing and evaluation tables show section totals at the end of (merged) rows, and there is no sensible way to recreate this using the current PandaDoc tables. We can merge across, please can we merge down too?!
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
234 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
354 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
This is an essential update for us - attachments in our legal contracts need to be retained by the (external) signatories, or else they are worthless! Please could this be revisited?