Settings and activity
11 results found
-
184 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged from when the previous comment was posted. Please check back for updates.
An error occurred while saving the comment Lorraine Ashover
commented
This would be really useful - we want to ensure that all info is captured correctly in our documents, which involves making our fields compulsory in as many places as possible. Allowing conditional fields in the content library means that we can do this throughout the docuemtn, ensuring that signers complete all the required information, but arent forced to enter information in places that isnt relevant.
Its great to have this feature in the core template, but not being able to include it in the content drawn from the library makes it rather redundant!Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
70 votes
We wanted to share an update regarding zooming in or out of the document. After careful consideration and further analysis of the idea, we have adjusted its status to "Not Planned."
This change allows us to further explore the feasibility and impact of this and other requested enhancements, ensuring that any updates we introduce are in the best interest of our users and align with our platform's long-term vision.
We appreciate your understanding.Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
100 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
156 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
143 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
294 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
665 votes
Hi. Thank you so much for reaching out and sharing your perspective. We offer this feature in scope of a broader solution, namely:
We hope these releases can help you. If not, please keep upvoting this idea, so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
58 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
An error occurred while saving the comment Lorraine Ashover
commented
This is really important to us - a lot of our existing pricing and evaluation tables show section totals at the end of (merged) rows, and there is no sensible way to recreate this using the current PandaDoc tables. We can merge across, please can we merge down too?!
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
235 votes
The status of this suggestion is currently unchanged. Please check back for updates.
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
-
355 votes
Hi,
Thank you so much for reaching out – this is a great suggestion and we have had other customers asking about this feature as well. While we’re looking into the possibility of developing it, it isn’t on our product roadmap for the next few months. Please feel free to upvote or leave your comment to let us know how and why this functionality is important for you. Thank you!
Lorraine Ashover
supported this idea
·
This is an essential update for us - attachments in our legal contracts need to be retained by the (external) signatories, or else they are worthless! Please could this be revisited?