Skip to content

Settings and activity

11 results found

  1. 28 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lorraine Ashover commented  · 

    This would be really useful - we want to ensure that all info is captured correctly in our documents, which involves making our fields compulsory in as many places as possible. Allowing conditional fields in the content library means that we can do this throughout the docuemtn, ensuring that signers complete all the required information, but arent forced to enter information in places that isnt relevant.
    Its great to have this feature in the core template, but not being able to include it in the content drawn from the library makes it rather redundant!

    Lorraine Ashover supported this idea  · 
  2. 65 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi,
    Thank you so much for reaching out – this is a great suggestion and we have had other customers asking about this feature as well. While we’re looking into the possibility of developing it, it isn’t on our product roadmap for the next few months. Please feel free to upvote or leave your comment to let us know how and why this functionality is important for you. Thank you

    Lorraine Ashover supported this idea  · 
  3. 86 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Lorraine Ashover supported this idea  · 
  4. 134 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Lorraine Ashover supported this idea  · 
  5. 135 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Lorraine Ashover supported this idea  · 
  6. 260 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Lorraine Ashover supported this idea  · 
  7. 596 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Lorraine Ashover supported this idea  · 
  8. 52 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi. We aren’t planning on building this into our feature set at this point in time since it doesn’t fit into our current product roadmap. Please keep upvoting this idea so we can keep considering it every time we work on our roadmap.

    Should you come across any other ideas that suit your business needs, don’t hesitate to give them an upvote!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lorraine Ashover commented  · 

    This is really important to us - a lot of our existing pricing and evaluation tables show section totals at the end of (merged) rows, and there is no sensible way to recreate this using the current PandaDoc tables. We can merge across, please can we merge down too?!

    Lorraine Ashover supported this idea  · 
  9. 216 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Lorraine Ashover supported this idea  · 
  10. 336 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi, we have good news! We have already started working on this feature, and it will be available in one of our upcoming releases. We will be communicating it through our product newsletter and via a notification inside PandaDoc.

    Lorraine Ashover supported this idea  · 
  11. 322 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Lorraine Ashover supported this idea  ·