Skip to content

Ideas to Improve PandaDoc

💡 To help us understand (and hopefully implement!) your suggestion, please answer these few questions as you propose your idea:
  • What specific actions or behaviors do you expect from this feature?
  • What is the issue that this functionality would address for you? Why would you require it?

Ideas to Improve PandaDoc

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

2991 results found

  1. When syncing PandaDoc pricing tables/quote builders to Salesforce Opportunity Products, discount format mismatches ($ vs %) cause sync failures or incorrect data mapping.

    PandaDoc allows line items to accept both flat-amount ($) and percentage (%) discounts, but the Update Opportunity Products trigger syncs discount values as-is without format normalization. If a line item has a $ discount and the mapped Salesforce field expects %, the sync breaks or writes the wrong value.

    Goal: Automatically normalize all discounts to percentage format during SFDC sync, so:
    - If a line item has a $ discount, convert it to the equivalent %
    -…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Since the recent changes, our workspace users are now able to add, delete and move fillable fields when sending templates. They CANNOT be allowed to do this. It creates major problems including potential legal issues. We need to be able to turn off/remove this option for our users.

    rephrasing: As an Enterprise admin, I need to prevent my workspace users (non-admin members) from adding, moving, or deleting fillable fields when creating documents from shared templates. Our documents contain legally-sensitive field placements and unauthorized field modifications create compliance and legal risks. Content Locking currently does not protect fields (by design). We…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Allow the ability to add a 0 zero quantity to a quote from CRM

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. an option to create a private folder within the workspace

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Provide a Wrapper in template builder that converts a plain text token passed through to the Template into HTML (hubspot Rich Text field support)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. With the launch of HubSpot's New Revenue hub features Pandadoc has become less of a conversation item

    While the presentation of a pandadoc proposals that we are able to produce with it are superior to hubspot quotes , Pandadoc has become less of a conversation piece in our conversations with hubspot clients exploring Revenue Hub with hubspot as the current integration doesnt support the contracts Object leading to costly workarounds where it makes more sense to just use HubSpot quotes for those clients.

    Suggestion: Add the contracts object to the list of supported objects from which one can interact with…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Ability to limit a user's ability to send documents via text (SMS)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Currently, reporting and CSV exports include statuses like Draft, Sent, Viewed, Completed, Expired, and Declined, but there is no way to see a global count of documents that were rejected in the approval workflow.

    “Rejected” exists as a document status in the API, but it is not available in reporting dashboards or exported analytics files.

    Request: Add a Rejected status tile in reporting and include it in the CSV export so teams can track this metric across all documents.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Currently, it is possible to mark individual bundles within a price table as optional. The request goes one step further: the complete price table — consisting of multiple sections and line items — should be treated as one shared optional unit.

    The individual sections and positions should remain visible and listed as before. However, the selection or deselection happens globally via a single checkbox that includes or excludes the entire table at once.

    Desired Behavior

    A top-level checkbox controls the entire price table

    When checked: all contained line items are included in the total

    When unchecked: the entire price table…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. The Quote Builder does not support merging two sections into one while preserving both section titles as sub-headers. Users who need multiple product groups displayed under a single shared header (e.g., "Section 1" and "Section 2" both under "Monthly Recurring Fees") currently have no way to achieve this. Each section header stands alone with no parent-child relationship available. Request: allow sections to be merged or support a parent header that spans multiple sections, replicating the layout flexibility that existed in the classic Pricing Table.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. We need to see the audit trail while working inside a document in draft status. Currently, all we can see is the audit trail after it's been approved (WHY?). The only other way I see where the audit trail will appear is if you click on the three dots on the all documents screen, which means we would have to close out of the draft to go back to see comments that we used to see in the chat section. Not having chat is a huge problem for us. At least show the audit trail in document details on a…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Users migrating from the classic Pricing Table are unable to insert full-width text rows that span all columns within a Quote Builder section. In the Pricing Table, this was used to visually group line items under sub-headers (e.g., "Nomic Outpost" and "Nomic Insight" nested under a single "Monthly Recurring Fees" section header) without displaying values in the pricing columns. The Quote Builder currently only supports one section title per section, making this layout impossible to replicate. Request: allow users to insert full-width text/label rows within a section to act as visual sub-group headers.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. There is a major friction point when collaborating on a document and toggling between "Suggesting Mode" and "Editing Mode".

    Currently, if a user makes several text suggestions in Suggesting Mode, but then needs to toggle into Edit Mode to make a structural change (such as adding a row to a table or adding a dependency), all prior unaccepted suggestions in the document are completely lost and wiped out.

    Because suggestions are treated as temporary overlays, structural edits force a document re-render that deletes previous work. This forces users to either completely redo their suggestions or completely abandon Suggesting Mode in…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. When I select 'preview' on a form under the templates tab, it creates a new form, which is then deducted from my usage credits -- this is deceptive, as a preview shouldn't create a new form. A preview -- by description -- is supposed to show you what the page will look like when active, but not be active itself.
    The usage credits are very expensive, so you need to warn people in advance that you can't preview a form without creating one, and that it will cost you a credit. I've wasted a bunch of credits on this, when…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Now I would like to share a feature request that would significantly improve our experience with PandaDoc and, we believe, provide value to many corporate customers.

    In certain document workflows, there are situations where one of the designated signers is either unwilling or unable to sign a document. However, the validity and legal effectiveness of the document are not affected by the absence of that particular signature. Typical examples include:

    Board resolutions
    Other corporate governance documents where a predefined majority is sufficient for approval
    Currently, PandaDoc does not provide a way to either:

    Remove a signer after the document has…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Workflows  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Many customers need to make updates to templates on an annual or monthly basis and at the moment the best option is to duplicate the template and make the changes ahead of the deadline, then transition and train all users to use the new templates on the day of deadline. It would be great to schedule updates to templates ahead of time to go live on a specific date for the existing template that the users are already familiar with using. This would save the rush to update and swap templates within a tight turnaround as well as reduce the…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. The classic PandaDoc experience has been a reliable part of our day-to-day workflow. Since being migrated to the new editor, several pain points have significantly impacted productivity: there are too many steps in the document creation flow, and the overall experience feels choppy and disjointed. The new experience does not feel efficient for the team's volume of work. We would like to request the option to permanently retain the classic PandaDoc experience, or at the very least have the migration cutoff extended beyond Q3 2026 so that there is more time to adjust before being fully transitioned.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. When PDF is downloaded auto generate bookmarks (based on heading styles possibly).

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?