Skip to content

Ideas to Improve PandaDoc

💡 To help us understand (and hopefully implement!) your suggestion, please answer these few questions as you propose your idea:
  • What specific actions or behaviors do you expect from this feature?
  • What is the issue that this functionality would address for you? Why would you require it?

Ideas to Improve PandaDoc

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

2908 results found

  1. When a document is manually moved to "Completed" (to reflect an offline/outside signature), any attached payment step is silently bypassed. There should be a way to still trigger or prompt for payment collection in this scenario.

    Current Behavior - If a signer executes a contract outside of PandaDoc and you manually update the document status to Completed, the payment block attached to that document is skipped entirely. The only workaround is to collect payment through a separate tool and then manually mark the document as Paid in PandaDoc.

    Expected Behavior - When manually completing a document that has a payment…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. I'd like the document reminders that I specify on my PandaDocs that are automatically sent to get logged back to the relevant records in HubSpot (deal, contact, company). I'm hoping that will show in the Emails and All Activity sections to give me a clearer picture of activity on my Deals.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. As a professional services firm using PandaDoc for client proposals and engagement workflows, I would like the ability to disable or customize opt-out/reporting links in white-labeled delivery emails.

    These links can create confusion for clients, weaken the premium branded experience, and unintentionally reduce trust during sensitive onboarding workflows such as accounting, tax, legal, or advisory engagements.

    Ideally, firms using custom branding and verified sending domains should have an option to:

    remove “report spam” style messaging,
    customize footer language,
    or use a cleaner fully white-labeled email experience.

    This would significantly improve the client experience for firms using PandaDoc as a client-facing…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Option to automatically create an invoice that reflects the agreed-upon PandaDoc quote.
    Steps:
    1. The client selects their desired options in the quote and submits it for approval.
    2. Event sales either approves the selection or sends it back for adjustments.
    3. Once the final selection is confirmed and approved, PandaDoc automatically transfers the quote information into an invoice template.
    4. The client receives the contract and the generated invoice simultaneously.
    5. The client signs the contract and is immediately directed to the payment gateway.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Workflows  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Currently you cannot display to the client the total net price without VAT, fees, etc. Many clients need to see this data in the quote.
    Also, there are different tax % and it is not possible to show the total for each tax rate. This is important for our clients

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. I would like the ability to set a timeframe in which a client can sign their document, such as no sooner than 30 days before the expiration date. Our process specifically requires their signature to be within 30 days of the planned service date for legality. We would like clients to be able to see and review the document before then, but not allow them to sign it until a specific timeframe. Rather than fill in a data manually, we would like to select something like expiration date minus 30 days as the soonest signing date so that it auto-calculates…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Problem: When the final approver is also the first signer, they can’t sign until after a rep sends the document, creating delays and extra handoffs.

    Request: Allow an approver who is also a recipient in the signing flow to approve and complete their signature in the same action, or allow post-approval pre-signing before external send.

    Value: Faster turnaround, fewer internal steps, clearer accountability.

    Acceptance criteria: Optional toggle at template/workflow level; audit trail records both approval and signature events.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Approvals  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Currently, bundling documents can only be done for documents in Templates. However, the individual documents found in Templates can't be updated easily with "Replace Source File." This feature is only available in Content Library.

    Updating various documents to be bundled together in Templates requires that I have the documents as Content Library items to perform any updates. Using "Replace Source File" allows me to keep any fields that were created rather than having to create them all over again or copying and pasting. Once it's updated as a Content Library item, I have to create a new Template with the…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Customer is requesting improvements to multi-workspace API architecture for Enterprise franchise use cases.

    Current customer environment:

    40+ franchise offices
    Each franchise requires its own PandaDoc workspace
    Users may belong to multiple workspaces
    CRM + embedded signing workflow is the primary use case
    PandaDoc is being used primarily as an API-driven signing/orchestration layer

    Current pain points:

    Workspace API keys are isolated per workspace
    Customer must maintain:
    workspace API keys
    workspace/user mappings
    webhook management per workspace
    synchronization logic internally
    No efficient org-level way to dynamically determine which workspaces a specific user belongs to

    Main customer request:

    Org-level API endpoint to retrieve workspace…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. I have seen that it is possible to update fields in Pipedrive through variables present in a document. Although there is no way at the moment, to decide WHICH varibles (and so CRM fields) to update, leaving the others unchanged.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Automations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. It would be great if the final, completed document signed by customers could be saved as a different file name than the template name.

    For example, the Template Name is Pacific Solar Contract - [Deal.DealName] because it is customer facing, but when the final, signed PDF is downladed to our server, we would like to name the file yyyy-mm-dd - [Deal.DealName], Signed Contract (with the date being the completed date).

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Is there a way to pass through payment processing fees to the customer based on their selected payment method?

    Currently, I apply a flat 3% “Credit Card Fee” to invoices, but bank transfer/ACH processing fees are actually lower. I’d like to offer customers multiple payment options while only charging the applicable processing fee for the method they choose, rather than charging ACH/bank transfer customers the higher credit card rate.

    Ideally, this would:

    Automatically adjust the fee based on payment method

    Clearly display the fee breakdown to the customer

    Allow lower-cost payment methods like ACH/bank transfer to have reduced fees

    Still…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. We have had a few potential customers who have requested confirmation that their contract was cancelled. Please add a status option to Void/Cancel a contract and notify the signer in question. This status is different than what is available (i.e. Declined, Expired, etc.).

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Allowing colours to be added to tags so that they can stand out visually and provide a quicker way of visually sorting the tags attached to a document

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Right now, you can drag fillable fields by double-clicking and holding onto the second click. It would help with accessibility to have a visual button that lets you click on it instead of the actual field.

    This way, you know that you are clicking on the button to "Drag" or "Move" the field. And it avoids "Clicking" on the actual field

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. The old forms feature had a blurred background image of a form behind the pop up window. Smart Forms do not have the background image and I prefer it.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Forms  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. What’s the problem?

    There’s currently no way to resize multiple fields at once in the document editor. Users must manually resize each field individually, which is time-consuming when working with forms that have many fields.

    What we need:

    The ability to select multiple fields and resize them all to the same dimensions in one action.

    Why it matters:

    Saves significant time when building forms and templates
    Creates consistent, professional-looking documents
    Reduces repetitive manual work
    Current workaround:

    Resize one field, then duplicate it—but this doesn’t help when fields already exist and need to be standardized.

    This version is concise and gets…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Currently, custom Field IDs for fields added to Content Library documents automatically include a number starting with "1" after the Field ID name. A specific Field ID has been entered for a Fillable Field that would be the same in various documents in the Content Library. Adding various forms with these fields into a template do not link because a number is being added to the Field ID name. Users have to manually check each field and delete the number from the Field ID so that it can automatically link to each other throughout the document. For long documents, this…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Can you please add a function that allows users to center objects on the page or always have the center alignment line populate?

    When working on a page with multiple content boxes it is nearly impossible to drag a new object (text box) to the actual center of a page due to PandaDoc using grid-based relative layout where it prioritizes alignment to different boxes rather than the actual center of the page. The center line should always populate to ease the process for users manually adjusting documents. Even if there was a button to center the object, like you center…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Feature Request:
    Add the ability to save and reuse individual standard fields (such as Name and Job Title) as standalone items that can be quickly inserted into any document, especially when working with different uploaded PDFs.

    Problem It Solves:
    Currently, when users work with different PDFs each time, they must manually recreate common fields like “Name” and “Job Title” for every new document. There’s no way to save these standard fields as reusable items outside of templates or content library blocks.

    How It Should Work:
    Users should be able to save individual fields (e.g., “Name” text field, “Job Title” text…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?